To proceed, addressing the observation made by Mr. Meade marked A on K14/5. We urged the point marked A in 8317/90, but were in receipt of 13643/90, wherein we gave pressing reasons. Moreover, for the point in question, I'm afraid we cannot successfully bring up the argument again, especially as it would involve the amendment of the Army Estimates. I mention this because I was not sure whether the above despatch and letters had been overlooked when Mr. Meade's written minute was considered.
See also 9818, M.1615, and gu/15/5. I am aware that the proposal had been negatived, but I hope that the less time that has elapsed means that if this computation could still be made, it would facilitate the arrangement.
Another debate has avoided this necessity for this revote, giving occasion for questions; and that his Lordship further proposes to refer to his despatch of 7th March (No. 3484). We enquired whether W. Stanhope could provide an approximate date, and what assurance there was as to the garrison being brought to its full strength at the earliest possible date.
Le Can, at which crossed this; and as to what assurance as to the garrison being brought to its full strength the earliest possible date. Enquiring whether W. Stanhope could provide an approximate date.
Mr. Meade. Soprands. Yes.
The W.O. would not shorten payment of the increased contribution until they were able to import the additional garrison party on account. Publicly, the increased contribution is levied; they should quietly facilitate the arrangement.
RM 12/5 of the dunning letter.
W. Bramston, M. Mcad. We gave reasons. In an, the point in Jam afraid not desp.
3484/91, W.O. 831.
Page 352
en99/5, 9.8.91, GR1178/1922/32(III), XCR(85)72.
has been removed as it is not clear whether it is part of the original text or not. The original text is preserved as much as possible. The text has been formatted into paragraphs and minor corrections have been made to spelling and spacing. The original page numbering "Page 352" has been kept as per the instructions. The file references have been formatted to remove any spacing.a
another
debati
a
the
have avoided this necessity for this revote [giving occasion for questim]; and that his Lordslich further proposes to refer to his despt of 7th March [m 3484
can
Le
at
which crossed this; and ast whot what assurance
as to the garrism being giver as to the brought to its full strength the Earliest possible date
Enquiring whether W-Stanhope approximate date
Сама
-five
Av
Mr. Meak.
Soprands
Yes.
of
en99/5
బా
9.8.91
the W.O. wouldnot short payment
the increased contribution until
the
They were able to import the additional gamison party on account pubicl increased contribution is levied they hould queathy facilitate the ampoomrey
j tms at RM 12/5 of the duin.
gra
the point wh. I always fave most difficulty in defending when t
Vivitas call
RM 12/5
e
}
1
352
To proceed, addry the chervation made by M
Mear marked A
K14/5
W. Bramstin
M. Mcad
We urged the point marked A 8317/90, but gave was in receipt of 13643/90,
oir 831
we gave
pressing
an
3484191
W.0.
reasons
Moreover
for
in an
the point in
Jam afraid
not
desp
cannot successfully wing up the argument again, expecially as it would involve the amendment Estimates
? Imention
of the Army These points before drafting
because I was not sure hes & letters
the above desp
that
we-R
not overlooked when M. Meade'; written numinte
See als 9818
M.1615
gu/15/5
Jury aware that the puposal had been negatived but in is hove the less time that if this commpion. could still be made in would
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.